Comments for Newbornbusiness

Comment on Coming Back from the Banned World Of Google Adsense by SwampFox-82nd

SwampFox-82nd — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:52:07 +0000

Cool, anyone who could invest that much time finding an answer to those who know what was actually posted, salute… ~Peace~

PS: Toke ‘em, if ya’ got ‘em… \ v / ciao

Comment on Coming Back from the Banned World Of Google Adsense by accessko

accessko — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:49:11 +0000

Great Post. I read a lot of post of people that were banned from Google Adsense but I never hear that someone really came back.

Comment on For Adwords Advertisers ,Watch your security by Newbornbusiness

Newbornbusiness — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:04:16 +0000

You are right, thanks for the note. The article was written on word and pasted, that’s why the link was active but we edited it now.

Comment on For Adwords Advertisers ,Watch your security by T

Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:12:55 +0000

This a great tip, but I wouldn’t make the link clickable.
Last thing you want is backlinking to a Trojan Horse site.
Just my two cents

Comment on For Adwords Advertisers ,Watch your security by hurr1

hurr1 — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:31:59 +0000

I got the same message in our e-mail. We didn’t click the link. Thanks

Comment on Will the removal of SU 200 friends limit really work? by Bill

Bill — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 04:43:12 +0000

I am not misled into thinking that someone who shares an interest or two with me is automatically my ‘friend’. Boogers … until we’ve shaken hands a few times and discussed something or other over too much coffee, they aren’t even much of an acquaintance!

So let’s make this perfectly clear: if you like my blog, that’s good. If we share interests, that’s also good. But I’m not spending all day agonizing over online friends when I have plenty to do IRL.

BOOST a 200 ‘friend’ limit? They ought to lower it to 25. That would force people to be more selective about who their ‘friends’ are.

Comment on Google Docs, Is it a new marketing Tool? by Newbornbusiness

Newbornbusiness — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:49:23 +0000

Thanks Stephen for your posting. Actually we wanted to urge readers to investigate Google Docs features. And we are willing to post a new article but in “marketing technique” category. But you push us to mention everything now LOL..
The kind of sharing here is creating template content that can be posted to the public on http://docs.google.com/templates. If you have a good online business, you should a developer that work with you.
you can see also some infhttp://documents.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=72667

Comment on Google Docs, Is it a new marketing Tool? by @Stephen

@Stephen — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:00:32 +0000

I’d like to know more about exactly what kind of sharing you are talking about, could we get some more details?

Comment on Consequences of YouTube’s new guidelines by Newbornbusiness

Newbornbusiness — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:19:28 +0000

Thanks Brad for putting more light on this point. Because I see that there is no other reason for the people’s anger except their sensitivity against governmental Authority . YouTube didn’t apply new rules but they just remind people clearly about what they should do. You are also right , they should care about the misleading hot keywords.

Comment on Consequences of YouTube’s new guidelines by Bradford

Bradford — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:38:03 +0000

You make a good point that it is not the censorship itself, but the censorship in relation to the government’s suggestion. I don’t believe YouTube will take much of a hit. Part of the reason YouTube became so successful in the first place was because of its censorship (or more accurately, quality control). While you may have to worry about being Rick-rolled when you click on a “Presidential debate” video, you don’t have to worry about spam shock video advertising (using violence, porn, etc.) simply using hot keywords to draw people to their website.